Why were these formulas originally created?

The Devine formula, the most widely used of the three, was originally developed in 1974 specifically to help calculate appropriate medication dosages based on body size — not as a general fitness or aesthetic target, which is a common misunderstanding of what these formulas were designed to do.

Why do the three formulas give different results for the same height?

Each formula was derived from a different research population and study, using slightly different statistical assumptions — there's no single universally agreed "ideal weight" formula, which is exactly why showing all three together illustrates that these are estimates within a range, not one precise number.

Why would a muscular athlete show as 'overweight' by these formulas?

These formulas are based purely on height and sex, with no accounting for muscle mass or body composition at all — since muscle is denser than fat, a lean, muscular person naturally weighs more than these formulas suggest for their height, despite having low body fat and excellent health markers.

Should I use this number as my actual weight-loss target?

Not directly — these are population-average, historically medical-dosing-oriented formulas, not personalized health targets. A healthcare provider considering your specific body composition, frame size, and health history can give far more meaningful, individualized weight guidance than any of these general formulas alone.

Is BMI a better measure than these ideal weight formulas?

Both have similar limitations — neither BMI nor these ideal weight formulas account for body composition, so both can misclassify a muscular person as overweight. Body fat percentage, measured directly, is generally a more informative single number, though a full health assessment considers multiple factors together.

Healthy Weight Range Calculator

See a Range of Ideal Weight Estimates for Your Height

Need to use Healthy Weight Range Calculator right now?

A single "ideal weight" number oversimplifies what's really a range depending on which reference formula is used. This tool calculates all three major formulas together, giving a realistic range rather than one falsely precise number.

No sign-upNo uploads 100% free

Height (cm)

These are population-average formulas from medical literature, not individualized targets — they don't account for muscle mass, frame size, or body composition.

Features

Runs entirely in your browser
Privacy-first — your data is never uploaded
Real-time, instant results
100% free, no sign-up required
Works on desktop, tablet, and mobile
No installation needed

Who uses this tool?

Fitness enthusiastsPersonal trainersDietitiansEveryday health trackers

People also search for

Ideal Weight Calculator Devine Formula Ideal Weight Calculator IBW Calculator (Ideal Body Weight)BMR Calculator tool Body Fat Percentage Calculator tool

About Healthy Weight Range Calculator

"Ideal weight" formulas were originally developed decades ago for medical purposes — primarily for calculating drug dosages based on body size — not as a personal fitness or aesthetic target, which is an important distinction often lost in how these numbers get used and interpreted today. This tool calculates ideal weight using three of the most established formulas from medical literature, all based purely on height and sex.

The Devine formula (1974), originally created for medication dosing calculations, is the most widely referenced and is shown as the primary result here. The Robinson formula (1983) and Hamwi formula (1964) are two other commonly cited variations, each derived from slightly different population data and producing slightly different results — showing all three together illustrates that "ideal weight" isn't a single precise number but a range depending on which reference formula is used.

These formulas are based purely on height and sex — they don't account for muscle mass, bone density, frame size, or body composition at all, which is why a very muscular, athletic person will show as significantly "overweight" by these formulas despite having low body fat and being in excellent health. This is a known and significant limitation, not a flaw specific to any one formula.

The practical value here is historical and reference context — understanding where these commonly cited numbers originally came from and what they were designed for — rather than treating any single result as a personalized target weight. A body composition measurement (like body fat percentage) combined with input from a healthcare provider gives a far more meaningful picture of healthy weight for a specific individual than these formulas alone.

How it works

Select your sex. Each formula uses a different constant for men and women.
Enter your height. The only other input these formulas require.
View results from three formulas. Devine, Robinson, and Hamwi, side by side for comparison.

Examples

Male ideal weight

Input

Male, 175 cm

Output

Devine: 70.5 kg

Female ideal weight